Is Slav Now Exciting, Correct?
- This topic has 18 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 1 year, 6 months ago by .
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Honestly i think they are getting massivly powercrept by the dravidians.
I wanted to make a post about this comparing their discounts and eco boni until castle age, but i lack the energy to do so whatever.
Dravidians also get bloodlines now, but slavs still lack good skirms so i dont know if the light cav is really that bad with wootz steel in mind in lategame trash fights.
Dravidians also get really good skirms too lol.
Idk it really feels to me like you are just better off playing dravidians and getting the same kinda infantry playstyle with the same powerspikes and have a better flow in general, atleast until castle age.
I also prefer archers with infantry over cavalry with infantry but thats just me.
Slavs were never boring, but they could’ve been better.
This is a step in the right direction for sure.
I like how everyone keep saying Slavs are fine yet nobody ever plays them
Right.
The infantry flavor is now achieved before Druzhina, which is also more affordable.
I missed a Monk bonus but they have gone for the Boyar way.
My only little worry is them looking too much like Bulgarians (biggest difference is that Bulgarians have serviceable CA, while Slavs have better Monks)