Prefer Between Two Options:
- This topic has 12 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 3 years ago by .
Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)
Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Take a look at the survey.
For everyone who has holes in their walls!! Remember, you can’t have a hole if you don’t build walls!
Anyone who didn’t pick win in a dominant fashion is a filthy liar
underrated poll with only one right answer
I want to win in a dominant fashion against an equally skilled opponent that I managed to outsmart. I don’t want to win because my opponent just doesn’t know how to play properly, though; then I’d rather spend my time losing in an interesting game.
Close back and forth games are more fun than steam rolling
On the ladder winning in a dominant fashion is against someone near your elo, so executing your strategy well and taking advantage of mistakes and getting a decisive win is great! It actually baffles me that most folks here would rather lose!
There’s something beautiful about achieving gridlock, much more so on more open maps or arena to an extent, knowing how many decisions and following execution went into it… most memorable games by far. Does not count for Black Forest Amazon tunnel michi nonsense. That’s just a grind though I do enjoy improving siege micro
Does anyone know how to avoid getting early rushed around 40 min mark?
At my elo you either have games that are long and drawn out or they resign when you raid with a few scouts in feudal, so it doesn’t really feel good to win. I’d rather play a full game even if I lose tbh.
Win in a dominant fashion cause that means my still ceiling is potentially higher
Close back and forth games are exciting. If you just want an easy win, you might as well play against standard AI and use cobra cars.
It depends
Always winning would be boring
And always losing would be demoralizing
And always meeting head on with a similar skilled opponent would be exhausting
Its all about the variation in those 3