If Chinese Obtained Hand-Cannoneer for Historical Reasons, What Nerf Would Be Most Appropriate?

  • This topic has 22 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 2 years ago by King_Jon.
Viewing 8 posts - 16 through 23 (of 23 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #7823
    adquen
    Guest

    HC doesn’t allow them to do something really better than now.

    They might save on archer upgrades, but upgrade costs are not really the problem of the civ.

    #7822
    Dark_Kactuzz
    Guest

    Loose Heavy Camel Rider, but keep Camel Rider.

    That way it’s only a nerf for Imperial Age, which is when they would get the HCs

    #7821
    TevecQ
    Guest

    Honestly don’t think having or not having HC is worth much at all.

    Seriously don’t think their winrate would change if it was just given to them

    #7820
    JarlFrank
    Guest

    While China invented gunpowder and used it early on in primitive fire lance weapons, once the Europeans adopted it at a large scale China was still just using it sparingly rather than developing the technology further and making it the main part of their armies.

    So it isn’t too historically inaccurate for them to lack hand cannoneers.

    #7819
    Tyrann01
    Guest

    That you have to be in a team game with Mongols to unlock it.

    #7818
    Then-Mulberry-1557
    Guest

    HC (hand cannoneer) for HC (heavy camel) would seem fair to me

    #7817
    Kahlenar
    Guest

    Slightly related: If they are making a huge china dlc I’d love to see one civ get a Hand Cannon downgrade for free in castle age, and auto upgrade in imperial after chemistry is researched.

    #7816
    Thangoman
    Guest

    HCs are fine.

    Problem with giving Chinese gunpowder is bombard cannons

Viewing 8 posts - 16 through 23 (of 23 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Back to top button
ajax-loader