Cost reduction is needed for siege towers.
- This topic has 20 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 1 year, 7 months ago by .
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
I want to see them used for more than just humorous purposes.
Their effectiveness is hindered by their high cost of 200 wood and 160 gold.
While I don’t believe the price should be significantly reduced, it’s difficult to afford them until the later stages of the game when your opponent has already prepared a counterstrategy.
Would you adjust their cost?
Please share your thoughts in the comments or downvote if you disagree.
Man people want discount real bad 💘
Make them cheap and low hp, so the enemy has to sortie to destroy them or use a magonel
I wouldn’t mind seeing siege towers only costing 125 wood.
Siege is powerfull, siege towers are a huge niche and too expensive especially if they don’t work out.
My suggestion: Pay me.
If you pay me, I’ll make the unit at some point in the game.
I think we’re due for the first trash siege option.
Introducing the Siege Tower 2.0 (200wood, 0gold)
How about being able to garrison scorps?
Nice buff for both plus some historical accuracy
Make petard creation faster and remove the siege tower
I just removed the hot key for siege towers yesterday.
I was accidentally making it
Reduce the costs by half and make both of its armor 200+.
Then use them for walls 😉
I would like to see them completely removed from the game.
I agree and while we are at it make rams a little bit more resistant to mangonel shots so a castle + mangonel behind it, isn’t completely undestroyable in castle age.
I feel this is the major problem with rams (in castle age) right now.
Great poll only putting options that agree with the proposal.
I believe that siege towers need a rework by either allowing garrisoned units to fire inside it or adding an ability that enforce the opening of the gate.
Reducing its training cost cannot change its uselessness.
I saw a video of Survivalist using siege towers not to cross walls, but to drop byzantine infantry on Mayan crossbows + arbalests.
It was absorbing arrow shots and the mayans dont’ have cavalry to kill it.
This seems like a better use for them than crossing walls, but I don’t really know.