Q&A

Genitours for Center Jap civs

Mounted Skirmisher

What about rising the novel Genitour by renaming it to Mounted Skirmisher and giving them to all center japanese civs? (those that part that structure space). I agree with this adresses some (albeit minor ones, positive) points with in spite of every little thing 2 civs, and lengthen the strategic scope of the other 2. Reasoning runs as follows:

BERBERS

Obviously the Berbers are the well-known to address here. They lose their crew bonus, but as an various I agree with they’ll also lose Kasbah and create it their crew bonus as an various (crew castles work quicker from the decide up wander). In compensation, they’ll also decide up a recent castle age irregular tech that adresses (minorly) their later issues with a siege ram/halb push (the name is virtually a placeholder here):

IBERIAN CONQUEST > Gentle cavalry +2, Mounted Skirmishers +1 assault against siege items (this might well create even tiny groups of now genitours deal with out issues with mangonels, and even defend clastles from ram pushes).

TURKS

The income is obvious here, giving the turks a improbable comp even in put up put up imp when gold has race out (maybe their Mounted Skirmishers can agree with to serene not decide up the advantages of Sipahi).

PERSIANS

No longer rather a lot to focus on here, for the reason that persians already agree with an excelent combo with out gold in their hussars and trashbows. This might well give them a bit extra mobility and alternate choices against pikes and halbs within the occasion that they don't agree with a castle yet, or don't are on the lookout for to burn their gold with hand cannons.

SARACENS

Lastly, the saracens don't with out a doubt resolve on much of a buff, but for the reason that pattern within the game is that regional items (eagles, steppe lancers, wrestle elephants, elephant archers, and rather a lot of others.) are usually assorted in stats and roles among the civs that decide up decide up true of entry to to them, the Saracen Mounted Skirmishers would be those (maybe) to make a decision on up pleasure from the additional assault against structures (or maybe affected by Zealotry).

And so, Mounted archers would maintain assorted roles for the 4 civs, Berber ones being exact against (low numbers of) siege, Turks resolving their advise without a gold, Persians lacking bracer but collectively with much extra mobility to their slack game, and Saracens presumably getting extra HP or the potencial of destroying structures or busting thru early partitions. What own you watched?

Genitours for Middle Eastern civs

Related Articles

0 0 votes
Guide Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
2 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
GregStein
Admin
1 year ago

Turks now not having elite skirmishers is a characteristic so I’m uncertain why you suspect it’s a question in your conclusion. They have not got genitours. They already beget 7 PA hussars.

GregStein
Admin
1 year ago

Genitours for historical reasons ought to serene be on hand to Spanish and Portuguese. Steadiness-wise, I’m now not sure. Portuguese beget one in every of the categorical double gold combos in Fort Age. If they’d it, perhaps putting off Elite would suffice. Spanish would certainly beget the advantage of it and synergizes with their mounted theme (Conq + Donk).

Back to top button
ajax-loader