The Thirisadai: A Fantasy Unit From Age Of Empires II Based On A False Wikipedia Article

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 21 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #6861

    A fake Wikipedia article has been used to create a false Age of Empires II unit, known as the Thirisadai.

    This unit does not have any historical basis and is completely made up.

    #6872
    boxersaint
    Guest

    Next thing you know they’ll be saying Persians didn’t build TCs next to their enemies.

    What else have the devs lied to us about?!

    #6882
    peeking_duck4
    Guest

    yawn

    imagine being this bored with life and/or having this level of racial bias that you go to this extent to debunk a unit in a game that is literally saturated with fantasy.

    and then coming back 9 months later to try again.

    wow

    #6881
    reddteddledd
    Guest

    Cool.

    I also didn’t find the needle in the haystack I was searching for.

    So the needle doesn’t exist.

    #6880
    UweWeber84
    Guest

    The Indian playerbase is dedicated and based a f

    #6879
    Captain-Noodle
    Guest

    Chinese don’t have gunpowder, but historical accuracy is expected… okay

    #6878
    Apocalypso-YouTube
    Guest

    I remember sharing this post months ago here, but it’s good to do it again to spread the word even more.

    #6877
    Umdeuter
    Guest

    Uhm wasn’t there the exact same post about Turtle Ships or is my memory messing with me

    #6876
    niandra__lades7
    Guest

    When reading wikipedia at work goes wrong…

    #6875
    AerialAce96
    Guest

    Aren’t Xolotl Warriors ahistorical too?

    #6874
    fatalskeptic
    Guest

    They melt to Elite Longboats /irrelevant to topic at hand but I wanted to share

    #6873
    mindyourtongueboi
    Guest

    Damn

    #6871
    DocSanchezAOE2
    Guest

    The Thirisadai doesn’t have to be historical to be awesome!

    #6870
    slothismysin
    Guest

    it will be interesting to see how the aoe2 devs respond.

    #6869
    Nnarol
    Guest

    > I would recommend that the offending Wikipedia article excise sections 3 and 4 as there is no good evidence for their assertions.

    I am less sure of how to undo the fourteen years of misinformation but perhaps excising the original source of the lies might be a good start.

    And spreading the counter-claims among circles where this information has spread is a good continuation.

    Debate will facilitate the revision of both the original and the counter-claims.

    Thanks for sharing this article!

    I also read it on a history subreddit not too long ago.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 21 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Back to top button
ajax-loader