Should Knights Be Nerfed?
- This topic has 26 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 1 year, 11 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
I think yes, just because they make swordman usless there is No reason to build them because Knights do everything better, and that is Not good as some of you think tho.
No, Not in the least.
Spearman die so easy without the pikeman upgrade.
Knights need a nerf.
Crossbows need a nerf.
Sicilians have both.
Coincidence?
I feel like knights are good now.
In the past it was nonsense with 20 archers on one tile killing the same amount of knights.
Usually, I tend to refer to pro’s games and as long as you won’t see them going knights as ethiopians because kts are too strong we are fine.
The attributes of the common knight are the most well rounded and as generic as it is possible to be.
* 10 attack
* 100hp
* 2/2 armour
* Fast, but not too fast.
* Zero attack bonuses.​
Knights are pretty much *THE* unit.
I wouldn’t be surprised if they started with the knight and balanced everything else around it.
​
Only a damned fool would think knights need a nerf! … …
But, that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t buff everything else 😐
For the sake of completeness, there should be an option called “Knights need a buff.”
Just make knights cost 5 more food
Knights can be annoying and difficult to deal with but I feel like buffing their counters or other options is better.
Knight civs might also need a nerf/changes.
I just want them to have worse momentum in early castle age.
They do terrible things to the swordsman line right out the gate.
Maybe a bit slower creation speed?
Also some civs with bad cav could use a little buffing.
It wasn’t that long ago they nerfed archers.
I think nerfing knights might take us back to where we were.
Maybe that’s a good thing, idk.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
