As a 300 elo player, I assure you that I only lost because my opponent’s civ is OP and must be nerfed into oblivion.
/s
im going to say what i say everytime.
Not every civ need to be competent in every map and winrate doesnt exactly probe if a civ is strong or not ( at least on the numbers we usually see)
Drastically nerf every civ and over buff every civ month to month plz
Why learn game when you can just complain 🙂
I miss the days we all were required to post once a month on how to buff steppe lancers
Spanish should get nerfed in Nomad
don’t nerf anything,
instead, buff everything!
Talking about civ balance is fun.
What got you in a tizzy?
OP didn’t mention seeing calls to nerf Hindustanis.
That can’t be right…
Nerf Frannks.
Bloody Franks.
60% is a high threshold.
Ideally everything is 50%, but obviously that’s not realistic.
A good range is often 45-55% for many games.
AoE2 usually has outliers beyond that, those probably should be nerfed or buffed.
Idea: all civs are North Korea, dark age only, militia only.
I think 60% is a bit high bar before you start nerfing.
If we only nerfed civs above 55% and buffed civs below 45% the balance would be a lot better.
Do not forget about sicilians.