Convince Me: Fortress Should Always be Used for 1v1 Ranked Matches
- This topic has 18 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 1 year, 11 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
The desire to create a more varied and dynamic gaming experience has led to the introduction of Fortress mode.
This offers players a faster beginning than Empire Wars and a combination of strategies, making the game more interesting.
Additionally, the current Arena mode has become stale and predictable, so Fortress mode provides a refreshing change.
Alternatively, arabia to replace both
MBL: Auto Scout, auto Farms, Auto Walls might as well Auto Play.
No.
Did that convince you?
no way, arena is my favorite map and for others too
Please no
5) A DECENT MAP STRUCTURE
Arena would be sooo much better if you could spread out towards the sides and had normal woodlines
1) uh
2) Arena is more strategically diverse due to already having a castle in fortress
3) meh
4) Fortress could be better than arena if it was regicide—giving at least some strategic depth
5) Bonus: fortress unlike arena, favors players and civs that thrive on mobility just like arabia.
It simply allows players and civs that suck and feudal and castle to do well.
Arena is a true contrast to arabia in this way.
All this being said, if fortress became regicide, I support your motion.
I hate Fortress, but with regicide win condition it is at least marginally better.
Arena and fortress straight to the ban list
I hate maps with walls pre made
No.
Fortess sucks and Arena is actually a good 1v1 ma.
Why would we remove the best map in the game for something like fortress?
Ranked Fortress should be regicide.
Cheers
Replace all maps with Black Forest.
As a non arena player I veto this.
Arena is the second biggest map in the game why would u get rid of it from the map pool other than for selfish reasons
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
