Accused Of Upgrading?
- This topic has 16 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 1 year, 9 months ago by .
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
During my game today, my opponent accused me of “upgrading” and threatened to report me.
I am confused as to what this term means.
Additionally, my opponent employed a strange strategy by attempting a tower rush in Feudal on Arena and constructing numerous forward buildings.
However, I was able to easily advance to the castle age and defeat his forward villagers and towers with a small group of knights.
He ultimately quit in frustration when I was setting up a castle drop.
I was told I was gross for scout rushing.
Like what…
People will report you for doing anything out of the ordinary in multiplayer.
You should main Persian TC drop or cuman feudal ram push for a week and you will see what I mean lololol
Just ignore people and play whatever, and if you get banned just make a new account.
Lately I’ve been experimenting with siege tower shenanigans and despite not even having that much success people are already flaming me pretty hard.
It’s just how it is.
Play Cumans next time and go for a 2 TC feudal while ram rush his ass.
…
what?
What upgrading?
Clown logic.
T90 incoming
We need t90 to cast his games
lmao need to see this guy on LEL t90
Don’t worry about it.
I got reported once because I cheated by “using knights with Teutons which was taking an unfair advantage of the game”
Don’t mind him, there’s always weirdos online.
Once had a guy accusing me of cheating because my Malian m@a resisted arrow fire.
It’s a civ bonus.
Wait, what?
You went up to Castle Age, on Arena?
Seriously?
I hope you changed diplomatic stance to neutral, atleast?
But I guess its kinda fair since he built towers and not outposts as the rule book says 🤷♂️
What elo is this guy at?
Was it a no upgrade game?
Feudal Age Trush on arena is a legitimate strategy.
The rest of that is just a moron getting mad he got outplayed though 11
people do everything to be cast by T90 smh